PARALLÈLE | WATCHMAKING
GPHG 2026
GPHG 2026: A Strong Night for Independent Watchmaking
As Rexhep Rexhepi claimed watchmaking’s highest honor, Geneva celebrated an industry where independence, creativity and technical ambition are increasingly difficult to separate.
AWARDS · GENEVA · NOVEMBER 2026

GPHG 2026, Geneva. The 26th edition celebrated excellence across contemporary watchmaking.
There is something particularly satisfying about an evening that celebrates the established names of watchmaking while making room for those who have chosen to do things differently. The 26th Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève, held on November 7 at the Bâtiment des Forces Motrices, offered precisely that.
Twenty prizes were awarded, recognizing achievements that ranged from traditional craftsmanship and mechanical complications to unconventional design and artistic experimentation. But one of the most compelling stories of the evening was the prominence of independent watchmaking.
Rexhep Rexhepi received the prestigious Aiguille d’Or for his Chronograph Flyback, while several other independent creators and specialist watchmakers took home important distinctions. It was an encouraging result for an industry whose most interesting developments increasingly emerge from very different kinds of workshops.
THE AIGUILLE D’OR
The highest honor, an independent vision
Rexhep Rexhepi’s victory was the defining moment of the evening. The Chronograph Flyback, with its integrated manually wound movement, sophisticated finishing and carefully considered proportions, represents a particularly demanding expression of contemporary mechanical watchmaking.
Yet its significance extends beyond the technical achievement. Rexhepi belongs to a generation of independent watchmakers who have built their reputations around a recognizable personal vision, combining traditional techniques with an approach that feels unmistakably their own.
Winning the Aiguille d’Or places that vision at the center of the industry’s most prominent annual celebration. And it raises an interesting question: are independent watchmakers still challenging the established order, or have they become an essential part of defining what contemporary haute horlogerie looks like?

Chronograph Flyback by Rexhep Rexhepi, winner of the 2026 Aiguille d’Or.
THE INDEPENDENT SPIRIT
Independence was not a single story
The other independent winners made the evening even more interesting. Konstantin Chaykin’s ThinKing Mystery received the Audacity Prize, recognizing a willingness to challenge conventional ideas about watch construction and design. Cleguer’s Inspiration One earned the Complication Watch Prize, while Dominique Renaud’s Pulse60 Titanium Black received the Horological Revelation Prize.
Japan’s Otsuka Lotec won the Petite Aiguille Prize with the No.8, bringing another distinctive approach to mechanical watchmaking into the spotlight. And in the Challenge category, the SpaceOne × Baltic Seconde Majeure demonstrated how collaboration and imaginative design can find recognition beyond traditional luxury positioning.
These watches do not share a single aesthetic or philosophy. Some pursue technical innovation. Others reinterpret familiar mechanical principles or challenge expectations about what a watch should look like. What connects them is a willingness to explore ideas that might be more difficult to accommodate within the established codes of a large collection.
That diversity is perhaps the most encouraging aspect of the results. Independent watchmaking is not a style. It is a space for different ideas to develop.

Otsuka Lotec · No.8 | Konstantin Chaykin · ThinKing Mystery
A CHANGING INDUSTRY
A broader definition of excellence
Of course, the evening was not exclusively an independent triumph. Audemars Piguet, Chopard, Blancpain, Louis Vuitton and other established maisons also received important distinctions, demonstrating that technical and creative ambition is hardly confined to smaller workshops.
Nor should independence automatically be considered a guarantee of originality. A watch deserves recognition for the quality of its ideas and execution, regardless of the size or ownership structure of the company behind it.
What made this year’s results particularly interesting was the coexistence of very different approaches. A highly accomplished traditional chronograph could share the spotlight with an unconventional Japanese creation, a technically ambitious independent project and an elaborate mechanical achievement from an established Manufacture.
The revised GPHG categories also reflected a shift toward evaluating watches by their characteristics rather than by traditional gender-based classifications. That change feels appropriate for an industry whose creativity increasingly resists simple labels.
The challenge for the GPHG will be to continue providing a platform where different expressions of excellence can be considered on their own merits.
Independent watchmaking is not a style. It is a space for different ideas to develop.
SPARKLING PR | GPHG 2026
Three brands, different paths through the GPHG
The 2026 edition also offered an opportunity to revisit three creations from brands represented by Sparkling PR.
Their participation took different forms, from official nominations to entries in the initial competition, but together they illustrate the breadth of approaches present in contemporary watchmaking.
FREDERIQUE CONSTANT · TWO OFFICIAL NOMINATIONS
Two nominations, two philosophies

Classic Worldtimer Manufacture · Petite Aiguille | Classics Moneta Handwinding · Challenge
Frederique Constant reached the final nominations with two watches in different categories. The Classic Worldtimer Manufacture was nominated for the Petite Aiguille Prize, while the Classics Moneta Handwinding competed in the Challenge category.
The distinction between the two models is revealing. One emphasizes the technical capabilities of a Manufacture through a world-time complication. The other returns to the appeal of traditional manual winding and restrained design. Both reflect the brand’s longstanding ambition to make Swiss mechanical watchmaking accessible to a wider audience.
Neither won its category, but two nominations in the same edition represent meaningful recognition for two complementary expressions of that philosophy.
* Sparkling PR represents Frederique Constant exclusively in the Portuguese market.
SCHWARZ ETIENNE · ESSENTIAL CATEGORY ENTRY
The value of collaboration

1902 Synergy by Peter Speake · Schwarz Etienne
Schwarz Etienne entered the 1902 Synergy by Peter Speake in the Essential category, although the watch did not advance to the final nominations. The creation brings together the Manufacture’s mechanical expertise and the distinctive creative approach of independent watchmaker Peter Speake.
It is an interesting example of how collaboration can enrich contemporary watchmaking. Rather than treating independence as isolation, the project explores what happens when different forms of expertise meet around a shared idea.
In an edition that celebrated individual creative visions, it offers another perspective on the value of exchanging knowledge and experience.
MINASE · ARTISTIC CRAFTS CATEGORY ENTRY
Where craftsmanship meets art

Otherwise Than Being · Minase
Minase’s Otherwise Than Being, entered in the Artistic Crafts category, also participated in the initial selection without reaching the final nominations.
Based on the Japanese watchmaker’s distinctive DIVIDO architecture, the creation combines Minase’s expertise in precision finishing with the artistic vision of Towa Takaya. Its Yusai dial explores light, color and movement, introducing a contemporary artistic dimension to the brand’s unconventional case construction.
It is a reminder that the boundaries between watchmaking, decorative craftsmanship and artistic expression are often more fluid than traditional categories suggest. For an independent Japanese manufacturer, this dialogue between technical discipline and creative exploration is particularly compelling.
FINAL THOUGHTS
Beyond the awards
An awards ceremony inevitably produces winners and disappointed nominees. That is part of its purpose. But a prize list can also tell us something about the direction of an industry, particularly when the recognized creations represent such different approaches to watchmaking.
This year’s GPHG suggested that there is considerable room for individual voices. It also reminded us that the independent landscape is far from homogeneous. There are highly specialized mechanical innovators, artistic collaborators, small ateliers and brands working to make distinctive watchmaking accessible to different audiences.
Not every interesting creation receives a nomination. Not every nomination becomes a prize. And no single jury can define the full extent of creativity in an industry as varied as this one. Still, seeing independent watchmakers receive some of the evening’s most important distinctions is a welcome indication that individual vision continues to matter.
Perhaps that is the most encouraging conclusion from Geneva. Watchmaking’s future does not need to follow one path. And judging by this year’s GPHG, it certainly isn’t trying to.
PARALLÈLE | FURTHER READING
Explore the GPHG 2026
Discover the complete list of winners and the creations recognized at the 26th Grand Prix d’Horlogerie de Genève.



















